We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
A reduce court may well not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it can be unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it may well both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Also, it may well review an appeal of a decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by the New Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts In case the Commission cannot achieve a decision.
Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal has not but been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may possibly then request further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. During the meantime more info police shall remain neutral from the private dispute between the parties, however, if any with the individuals is indulged in criminal action the police shall consider prompt action against them under regulation. 5. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
PLR is actually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Because of this, basically citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Imagine it as calling somebody to tell them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in these-and-these types of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving round the community endeavoring to find their phone is probably going to get more frustrating than it’s worthy of.
Only the written opinions of the Supreme Court plus the Court of Appeals are routinely readily available. Decisions of the decrease (trial) courts usually are not generally published or dispersed.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) Just about every plus the same shall be stored from the police station towards the effect that no harm shall be caused on the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the 90 times for your department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided via the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe being a foster child. Although the couple experienced two youthful children of their own at home, the social worker didn't explain to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had young children.
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.